December 12, 2011
The Podium, Boston Globe: Be Prepared for Increased Shareholder Activism
By R. Robert Popeo and William A. Earon
Corporate directors can expect an active proxy season this year.
The combined effects of a sluggish economy, stock price volatility and
new regulations stemming from the Dodd-Frank Act are driving an
unprecedented level of shareholder activism. JP Morgan recently reported
that shareholder activism in companies over $1 billion increased by 90
percent in the first three quarters of 2011. It is thus crucial and
urgent for corporate directors to be well-prepared to face potential
pressure from dissident shareholders.
Lower stock ownership requirements for filing shareholder proposals mean
that almost any group – from institutional investers to labor unions to
religious organizations – can access the proxy to push its own agenda.
Activist agendas are rarely aligned with each other, and different
groups of activists can have not only conflicting interests but even
different definitions of shareholder value.
The result is that shareholder activism can have a variety of impacts –
both positive and negative. In some cases, shareholder activists
motivate boards to pay greater attention to issues that are important to
all shareholders, maximizing equity investment returns, in particular.
For example, when dissidents pressure management to increase operational
efficiencies or sell off low-performance businesses, activism may lead
to sustained growth in a company’s market valuation, although there
remains little empirical evidence supporting this statement.
On the negative side, however, it is not uncommon for shareholder activists to be primarily interested in short-term financial gains that may compromise a company’s ability to deliver greater benefits for all stakeholders – including shareholders – over the long term. Another problem is that responding to shareholder activists is typically time consuming and expensive for the board and management with respect not only to direct expenses for outside advisers, but also the opportunity costs that result when corporate leadership is distracted from strategic activities for long periods of time. If the shareholder activism is not anticipated and properly managed, these costs can cause significant harm to the company.
There are a number of steps that boards can take to manage shareholder
activism properly, and many of them revolve around transparency.
Companies that consistently practice open, honest communication with
their larger shareholders as well as the investment community as a whole
are more likely to be fairly valued in the marketplace and less likely
to become targets of activists.
A fundamental step is to be proactive about annual proxy communications,
ensuring that all proposed candidates for director seats are
well-justified and documented. In addition, it is important to have a
process to monitor social media communication – both outgoing and
incoming.
The power of social media – best illustrated by instances where a small
invester’s unsubstantiated comments go viral – are becoming more common
and, frequently, more damaging to both corporate reputations and
shareholder value. Social media commentary should be continuously and
closely scrutinized not only for subject matter but also for tone and
author credibility, and responded to when necessary.
When and how should shareholder activism be addressed by the
corporation? These questions should be addressed before a company’s
first encounter with dissidents. Reach out and listen to major
shareholders. Pay attention to social media. In advance, identify
spokespersons and determine how corporate responses will be crafted.
Anticipate issues that have the potential to encourage activists and
work on these issues proactively. Watch for changes in stockholder
composition, and consider what these changes could mean.
Increased shareholder activism is the new reality; being prepared for it is fundamental to good corporate governance.
R. Robert Popeo is president-elect of the New England chapter of the
National Association of Corporate Directors and chairman of Mintz,
Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. William A. Earon is the
Association's current president and founder and managing director of
Coastal Capital Advisors, LLC.

